OBJECTIVE:
Relate the intensity of the intermolecular forces to a
measurable property. Associate the intensity of the intermolecular forces to
structural characteristics of the molecules.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Evaporation rate is the rate at which a material will evaporate compared to the vaporization rate of a known material selected before. There are lots of factor affecting this: concentration, pressure, surface area and intermolecular forces. We have center on intermolecular forces. The stronger the intermolecular are, the harder are keeping the molecules together in the liquid state so the more energy is required. (Ilpi.com, 2010).
Evaporation rate is the rate at which a material will evaporate compared to the vaporization rate of a known material selected before. There are lots of factor affecting this: concentration, pressure, surface area and intermolecular forces. We have center on intermolecular forces. The stronger the intermolecular are, the harder are keeping the molecules together in the liquid state so the more energy is required. (Ilpi.com, 2010).
Here we can
see the chemicals we have used in the experiment:
HYPOTHESIS:
What will
happen in this experiment is that the more intramolecular forces the substance has,
the more time it would need to evaporate because it would need more heat energy
to evaporate as the attractions between the molecules of the same substances
are much more stronger and a lot more energy is needed to separate them and
apply energy to the molecules so they could get out of the flask. In my opinion
Ii think that butyl acetate would need much more energy and time because it has
the same intermolecular forces than the other chemical, but butyl acetat,
because it is bigger and it has much more elements in it, its Van der Waals'
forces would be much more stronger, having a higher evaporation rate, and in
the case of methyl acetate, because it is the smallest, would have a lower
evaporation rate.
RESULTS:
*We haven't
included the table because the data was given every 3 seconds, so there were 60
cells per chemical elements. For this reason, we decided to not include it.*
CONCLUSION:
As we can
see in our results, there’s a significantly drop of temperature in each of the
results, ones quicker than others, and this is caused because the substances,
to gain the enough energy to break the intermolecular forces which join the
substance and be able to evaporate, they absorb the only energy source or heat
they have, the thermometer. That is why we can observe how the temperature in
the thermometer falls during some time, because all the heat it had from the
room temperature has been as well absorbed by the substance which it was
inside.
Also, as we
described in our hypothesis, knowing that the substance with the weaker
intermolecular forces was methyl acetate and the one with the strongest was
butyl acetate, it has been demonstrated that substances with weaker
intermolecular forces need lees energy to evaporate, and we can deduce this
because methyl acetate shows in its quick drop of temperature that, by applying
the same temperature as the other substances, it needs much less time and
energy to evaporate all the substance absorbed by the paper envelope completely
(it ends evaporating when the thermometer goes back to the normal temperature)
due to the weakness of its intermolecular forces which makes most of the
molecules be able to separate easily and with less energy, and, at the same
time, butyl acetate does not even show a quick drop, it only falls down the
temperature very slowly, and this is caused due to the strength of its
intermolecular forces which need much more energy to evaporate tan methyl
acetate, so only some molecules are able to break free (that is why some heat
is absorbed from the thermometer) with that weak amount of energy while most of
them do not evaporate.
EVALUATION:
There were
some problems that we observed after doing the experiment which could have
affected our results in some way that they could have not resulted totally as
they should have been. This problems were:
-
The
paper envelope we used to absorb a sample of the substance which could
evaporate quicker had different sizes each time we did a different experiment,
could be bigger o smaller, and this affects the results because a higher amount
of substance is absorbed if the envelope is bigger, so it could need more time
than I should to evaporate completely. This can be solved easily by measuring
each time the paper envelope and make all of them in all the experiments
measure the same.
-
The
time which the envelope is introduced inside the substance is not specified, so
in each experiment the amount of substance absorbed by the paper can be more or
less each time, which can cause the same problems as the size of the paper
envelope. This also have an easy solution which is determine a specific amount
of time which the paper envelope would be deep in, controlled by a
chronometer.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
-
Ilpi.com,
(2010). The MSDS HyperGlossary: Evaporation Rate. [online] Available at: http://www.ilpi.com/msds/ref/evaporationrate.html [Accessed 21 Jan. 2015].
-
Smith,
C. (2009). Effects of Intermolecular Forces. 1st ed. [ebook] Illinois:
Palatine High School. Available
at: http://www.phs.d211.org/science/smithcw/Chemistry%20332/Quarter%202%20Unit%202/6%20Effects%20of%20Intermolecular%20Forces.pdf [Accessed 21 Jan. 2015].
- Good explanation of structures.
ResponderEliminar- Good clear graph.
- Relatively well explained conclusion.
- Paper envelope?
- Evaluation could have more detail about how the problems could have affected your results.
- Remember to use the "in-text" part of the reference in the appropriate place.
Excellent effort - 7/8